A Model for Effective Online Instructional Design
A Model for Effective Online Instructional Design
Introduction
The practice of developing educational experiences
that increases the efficiency, effectiveness, and appeal of learning is known
as instructional design (ID). It is also known as instructional systematic
design (ISD). Effective ISD models benefits for both teachers and learners. It
helps teacher to organize content, properly sequence lessons, support and help
learners, and encourage engaging, meaningful and active learning. The goal of
this paper is to discuss the principles of effective online instructional design that is essential for
developing online courses when taking pedagogical and learning theories into consideration.
Traditional ISD Model
The two traditional ISD model are ADDIE
model and Dick and Carey’s model. The ADDIE model offers five universal course
design principles: Analysis, Design, development, implementation and
evaluation. Its advantages include structured guidance for design, a helpful
checklist to ensure a solid course design and a strong emphasis on
implementation and evaluation. The disadvantage of ADDIE includes that the
design process of analysis step is not broad enough, the model is too linear
and not flexible, and it discourage creativity.
Dick
and Carey’s ISD model is more specific and rigid to each instructional step.
Their model focuses on actual situation, takes learners requirement, evaluates
their past knowledge, and incorporates learning and performance context into
the design. The model is also instructor focused, assumes the learner in
passive consumers of information and resources.
Online
instructional design models
There
are few online instructional design models, theories, and standards exist. There
are five instructional design models, theories, and standards relevant to
online instruction or e-Learning design. They are: (1) Alonso, Lopez, Manrique,
and Vines’ E-Learning instructional model, (2) the Instructional Design Model
for Online Learning (IDOL), (3) Roblyer’s online and blended learning design
theory, (4) the online instruction rubric by Quality Online Learning and
Teaching (QOLT), and (5) Quality Matters (QM) Publisher Rubric.
A
pedagogically effective model for online instructional design
According
to literature review, there are some principles for creating an effective
online course. They are Identify, Choose, Create, Engage, and Evaluate.
Identify:
The nature of an online course differs greatly from a regular face to face
course and hybrid course, identifying
a course format is initial process creating online course. Online
instructors identify and analyze the learning context. It is essential for online
instructors to provide a comfortable, safe and friendly learning environment
for their online learners.
Choose:
In
this stage, online instructors select content organization structure which
means to arrange linear or linear course material and information. Choosing
content organization format is essential because it influences students’
impression of online course as well as their access to and navigation of the
course contents.
Create:
The
third step is to create or develop. Online instructors design creates course
path or flow, instructional methods and materials for content presentation,
assignment, and assessment, interactive communication methods, and create
supporting materials for students.
Engage:
There were five condition that encourage online student engagement. They are
nature of discussion question, the mitigating factors for the level of student
response, learning community, student characteristics, and teacher
facilitation.
Evaluate:
This
is the last step of online instructional design. Student assessment should be
holistic and formative. Students’ performance can be evaluated
with projects, presentation, assignments, test, communication posts, etc.
Students’ performance in an online class should also be evaluated progressively
and periodically.
References
Casimiro,
L. T., (2016). Cognitive engagement in online intercultural interactions:
Beyond analytics, International Journal of Information and Education Technology,
6(6), 441-447.
Molenda, M., (2003). In search of
the elusive ADDIE model. Performance Improvement, 42(5), 34-37.
Comments
Post a Comment